|
Legal Considerations of Voice Logging
[For
more information, see our Voice Logging feature article
and Voice Logging Vendors.]
Legal issues regarding the recording of phone calls
must be considered before embarking on voice logging.
This varies on a state-by-state basis.
Some states and countries require "one-party notification" in which
only one of the two individuals needs to be made aware that the call is being
recorded. This, of course, is most
easily done by notifying the call center agents and staff.
This notice should be included in the employee handbook they receive when
hired. By signing off on the
handbook, it has been documented that employees have been duly notified that the
recording will take place. Check
with a local attorney familiar with state employment law, as it may be advisable
to have a separate sheet signed by each employee, which explicitly notifies him
or her that calls will be recorded. (At
least thirty-seven US States, the District
of Columbia, the US Federal law, Canada, and England only require one-party
notification. Note that there is
some disagreement over the determination of the requirements for a few states.)
The other scenario requires that both parties be made
aware that the call is being recorded; these are called "two-party
notification" states. (Depending
on the source, ten to thirteen US
states fit this category.) This can
be accomplished by playing a preamble recording on every call or inserting a
periodic beep tone.
The preamble recording is common, but may prove to be
a technical challenge to accomplish in a call center where multiple types of
calls are taken and for various departments or clients.
There is also the concern of how to respond to clients who object to an
automated announcement before every one of their calls.
Typical verbiage for the announcement or preamble recording is, "Thank
you for calling ABC Clinic, your call may be monitored for training or quality
assurance purposes."
Alternately, many voice logging systems provide an
optional beep tone. There are
specific parameters to which this beep must adhere.
According to VLR Communications, the beep tone needs to be a 1260 to 1540
Hertz tone, lasting 170 to 250 milliseconds, and broadcast for both sides to
hear every twelve to fifteen seconds when recording is taking place.
The interesting part of this requirement is that both parties must be
able to "hear" the beep tone; there is no measurable audio level specified.
Therefore, it makes sense to set the beep level at a low volume, while
still being audible to both parties. Still,
many people find this beep tone to be disconcerting and distracting.
Although call center agents typically grow accustomed to the beep tone,
eventually tuning it out, this is not the case with callers, who generally find
the ongoing beeping to be an annoying vexation.
Callers may even discuss the beep tone or voice recording with the
agents, thereby lengthening call time and decreasing the quality of service.
Several websites contain information about
notification; unfortunately, they are not in complete agreement.
This is shown in the chart below.
Regardless of this information,
be
sure to consult a local attorney before recording any telephone calls.
Also, there are privacy concerns and issues.
In general, one should take every possible precaution to avoid recording
personal phone calls. A practical
way of doing so is to only record conversations in the call center (and
explicitly not in the breakroom or on any common area telephone) and to have an
enforced policy against placing or receiving personal phone calls while in the
call center. These steps will help
to ensure that personal phone calls are not inadvertently recorded and that
privacy rights are not encroached. Again,
obtain legal counsel before recording any phone calls.
Voice logging is best used for quality assurance, training,
self-evaluation, verification, and dispute resolution.
Voice Recording Notification Requirements
|
Area |
Sources 1 & 2* |
Source 3* |
Source 4* |
|
Alabama |
One-party |
One-party |
One-party |
|
Alaska |
One-party |
One-party |
One-party |
|
Arizona |
One-party |
One-party |
One-party |
|
Arkansas |
One-party |
One-party |
One-party |
|
California |
Two-party |
Two-party |
Two-party |
|
Colorado |
One-party |
One-party |
One-party |
|
Connecticut |
Two-party |
Two-party |
Two-party |
|
Delaware |
One-party |
Two-party |
Two-party |
|
District
of Columbia |
One-party |
One-party |
One-party |
|
Florida |
Two-party |
Two-party |
Two-party |
|
Georgia |
One-party |
One-party |
One-party |
|
Hawaii |
One-party |
One-party |
One-party |
|
Idaho |
One-party |
One-party |
One-party |
|
Illinois |
Two-party |
One-party |
Two-party |
|
Indiana |
One-party |
One-party |
One-party |
|
Iowa |
One-party |
One-party |
One-party |
|
Kansas |
One-party |
One-party |
One-party |
|
Kentucky |
One-party |
One-party |
One-party |
|
Louisiana |
One-party |
One-party |
One-party |
|
Maine |
One-party |
One-party |
One-party |
|
Maryland |
Two-party |
Two-party |
Two-party |
|
Massachusetts |
Two-party |
Two-party |
Two-party |
|
Michigan |
Two-party |
One-party |
Two-party |
|
Minnesota |
One-party |
One-party |
One-party |
|
Mississippi |
One-party |
One-party |
One-party |
|
Missouri |
One-party |
One-party |
One-party |
|
Montana |
Two-party |
Two-party |
Two-party |
|
Nebraska |
One-party |
One-party |
One-party |
|
Nevada |
Two-party |
One-party |
One-party |
|
New
Hampshire |
Two-party |
Two-party |
Two-party |
|
New
Jersey |
One-party |
One-party |
One-party |
|
New
Mexico |
One-party |
One-party |
One-party |
|
New
York |
One-party |
One-party |
One-party |
|
North
Carolina |
One-party |
One-party |
One-party |
|
North
Dakota |
One-party |
One-party |
One-party |
|
Ohio |
One-party |
One-party |
One-party |
|
Oklahoma |
One-party |
One-party |
One-party |
|
Oregon |
One-party |
One-party |
One-party |
|
Pennsylvania |
Two-party |
Two-party |
Two-party |
|
Rhode
Island |
One-party |
One-party |
One-party |
|
South
Carolina |
One-party |
One-party |
One-party |
|
South
Dakota |
One-party |
One-party |
One-party |
|
Tennessee |
One-party |
One-party |
One-party |
|
Texas |
One-party |
One-party |
One-party |
|
Utah |
One-party |
One-party |
One-party |
|
Vermont |
One-party |
One-party |
One-party |
|
Virginia |
One-party |
One-party |
One-party |
|
Washington |
Two-party |
Two-party |
Two-party |
|
West
Virginia |
One-party |
One-party |
One-party |
|
Wisconsin |
One-party |
One-party |
One-party |
|
Wyoming |
One-party |
One-party |
One-party |
|
|
|
|
|
US
Federal |
One-party |
|
|
|
Canada |
|
One-party |
|
|
England |
|
One-party |
|
*
Sources:
1
The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press; www.rcfp.org.
2
VLR Communications; www.vlrcommunications.com.
3
National Association of Investigative Specialists, Inc
www.pimall.com/nais/n.tel.tape.law.html.
4
ACLU
Read
more articles
relevant to hospital and medical related call centers.
|