|
Charging for
Telephone Care:
An Initiative Whose Time Has Come!
By
Peter Dehnel, MD
August/September 2007
Imagine having a drive-up window
at your clinic where patients can simply come at any time of the day or night,
discuss their medical concerns, get your recommendations for care, get a
prescription or some of their services coordinated with medical specialists, and
then are sent on their way without charging a penny. Unthinkable, isn't it? In
this day of drive-up services, ease of credit card payments at fast food
restaurants, and McDonald's Big Macs, many products and services come with a
definable price. As a result, people are more than willing to pay for them. So
why should individualized medical advice be any different?
Consider the equivalent situation
where, instead of a drive-up window, a nurse or doctor simply substitutes
in-person care with care delivered over the telephone. A valuable service is
provided, care recommendations are given, a prescription is called in, or
assistance with coordinate care with specialists is arranged. Most medical
providers will end up not charge anything. Most clinics don't even have a
process to recoup some of their telephone care costs, even when it is costing
them several thousand dollars a year to give this care away free on the phone.
Telephone care and advice has
been around, literally, for over a hundred years. Most patients consider it as
part of their standard relationship with a clinic. This is especially true if
they have a question they feel does not require a face-to-face interaction with
a clinician. More significantly, most insurers consider it as a standard
inclusion in their contracts with clinics and not as a separate "episode of
care," which is then a billable service.
There are an expanding number of
reasons why it is important for all clinicians to rethink this paradigm and
consider charging for medical care that is delivered in non-face-to-face
settings. It is individualized patient care that you are providing to an
established patient. Just as you would not charge an office visit if you have a
casual hallway conversation in your office with a patient, you only charge for
telephone calls that have some element of medical decision-making.
Telephone care, when it is
considered as a part of total patient care, has a number of advantages to both
the patient and the clinician. It is providing care to the patient that is more
convenient and in a timeframe that meets their needs and availability. These
care encounters will likely cost the patient less, since the cost for these
visits will likely be less than the standard office visit. Since these have the
additional advantage of not requiring the patient to come to an office, they do
not have the indirect costs of missing work, driving to the clinician's office,
parking, and so forth.
For the clinic, telephone care
will free up appointment times to see the patients that truly need to be seen in
person. They will allow a broader number of options for follow-up care. Since
these calls have to meet all of the documentation requirements of an office
visit, the clinician will do a better job of documenting the telephone
encounter. This will give a more complete picture in their medical record, will
likely provide better coordination of care for patients with chronic conditions,
and will reduce legal liability issues related to undocumented care and advice.
Since a certain number of these calls will happen anyway, clinics will recoup
some of the cost of delivering this care that has previously been missed.
The American Academy of
Pediatrics has recently issued a policy statement supporting payment for
telephone care ("Payment for Telephone Care." Pediatrics
2006;118(4):1768-1773). This had been preceded by a 2003 policy statement by
the American College of Physicians endorsing payment for telephone care. In
addition, some insurers are now reimbursing for "e-visits" - non face-to-face
care encounters delivered over the Internet.
For those clinics and clinicians
who want to venture into this new territory, preparation is the key to a
successful outcome. You will need to develop a clinic process that includes
fairly explicit descriptions of what type of calls will be included, the basis
of charging for them, the documentation requirements and any supporting forms,
how billing will be accomplished, and what to do with patient complaints and
insurance denials. Your patients will have to be notified well in advance in a
number of different ways, and options to come in for a real face-to-face visit
may have to be available on a real-time basis. Finally, forewarning the
insurers is always a good idea, and you will need to determine what appeal
options for non-reimbursement are available to you.
Medical care over the phone is a
great option for patients and clinicians. There is no reason why it should
supplied free of charge in a haphazard way. It is time for clinicians to think
about this type of care in a new way. This is especially true in light of the
fact that the options for non face-to-face interactions are expanding much
faster than we can currently accommodate.
Peter Dehnel, MD, is the
Medical Director for Children's Physician Network (CPN) and the Medical Director
for Children's Physician Network Triage Service, Minneapolis, MN.
Read
more articles
relevant to hospital and medical related call centers.
|